Find your hidden killer features, they may be vital to your user adoption strategy

By Frank Spillers

on June 13, 2019 - 3:11pm
user alarm clock phone
Summary: Killer features are generally understood to be ranked highly on value proposition for users. However, there is a class of features that run under the radar of most sites, apps and experiences. These are features that bring users back, often without their conscious knowledge. They might even seem insignificant, but they provide some value that makes re-visiting worthwhile. Finding these features is an extremely worthwhile pursuit for product managers. 
 

Identifying hidden "killer features"

A "killer feature" is a concept software developers use to describe a high value or money-making aspect of a site, app or experience. Typically, these are either a) identified by experienced UX teams in advance of launch, or b) discovered or appreciated by customers as evidenced through sales, engagement or adoption. 

[WEBINAR + eBook]: The Secrets of how to get the most out of your Diary Studies

By Frank Spillers

on January 25, 2019 - 1:50pm
diary studies- user flips through booklet

Summary: Diary Studies are one of the most under-utilized and least understood UX techniques. Diary Studies are slightly more complicated than user testing and require additional know-how in study design, moderation and deployment. In this webinar and complimentary e-book, you'll learn how to use diary studies like a pro, avoiding the pitfalls inherent in diary studies.

 

Why Diary Studies?

 

How your team defines "user research" can hurt your UX

By Frank Spillers

on July 5, 2018 - 8:18am
man at whiteboard looking frustrated

Summary: 'User research' has become a catch-all phrase to mean user testing in many organizations. User research has two main activities: usability testing and field studies. Defining your design research with only a validation exercise (testing) misses the essential discovery of user needs, pain points and desires that Ethnographic Field Studies provide. User research should always mean more than just user testing!

How are you defining user research?

Many organizations we work with and UX designers we provide training for, tell us they do 'user research'. Once we dig deeper, we find they are defining user research as user testing. This means only half of UX insights are actually making it to your team.  

The two main types of user research your team needs access to:

What's wrong with Focus Groups and How to Fix Them

By Admin User

on July 31, 2017 - 3:34pm
focus groups for usability

Summary: Focus groups are innapropriate as a research technique to gather usability or user experience requirements. This is due to the fact they are opinion driven and not behavior driven. As a research tool they have a place in market research or early on "market idea" testing. As a way to influence usability or user experience projects, they are useless and misleading. To fix focus groups, they should be either: a) Abandoned in favor of ethnographic field studies or, b) Blended with behavioral research aka user interviews and observations to provide richer insights. 

The Power of Ethnography

By Admin User

on June 27, 2017 - 10:59pm
Margaret Mead- Ethnography applied to UX

Ethnography is a technique developed largely by anthropologist Margaret Mead. It involves behavioral observation, contextual interviewing and analysis of users in their work, home or play spaces. The key strength to ethnography is context. Context provides insight into not only who users are (demographics) but what is important to them and what causes them to act and make decisions (psychographics). 

Ethnography goes by a few different names. The most common include: Contextual Interviewing, Field Studies and Task Analysis.  My personal contribution to the field, called "Cognitive Archeology"(PDF) involves an analysis of user behavior and environment with an emphasis on understanding decision-making, problem-solving and the interaction of tasks, values and beliefs.

Your Personas are Garbage Without Good User Research

By Frank Spillers

on January 17, 2017 - 12:02pm
person peeking out of garbage can

Summary: Most persona development efforts are self-sabotaging because of one reason: a lack of good user research. The good news is this can be quickly turned around with an incredible impact on your software project and your overall organization's return on investment. This article explores why and how you can salvage your personas once and for all. 

Personas as Garbage, but why?

Many organizations use personas. Personas are the fun customer sketches that software development teams use to prioritize user needs. However most persona efforts are junk, owing to the origins of data used to inspire personas. We know several product managers who don't "believe" in personas.

How and When to use User Research- for award winning UX Design

By Admin User

on December 22, 2016 - 6:51pm
User Research class- when and how to use field studies

Summary: User Research is best performed early on and instead of simply validating your requirements, can help shape them. 

Clarification: By user research we will discuss Field Studies, not user testing (also referred to as user research). While we're on terminology, Field Studies are also referred to as Ethnography or Ethnographic Field Studies. 

Knowing what to do with your user research opportunity is important. The field study is a critical component of UX Design. It is often left out of most people's mental model (conceptions) about UX Design. User experience has two faces: Usability (ease of use) and Desirability (needs and wants). User research can help surface patterns, triggers, motivations and new innovations. 

Let's explore how, when and why to make the most of User Research through common misconceptions.